Event Comment: Benefit for ye Author (no more Noise) (Cross). Tickets as of 5 Feb. Tickets deliver'd out for
the third and sixth Nights will be taken. Receipts: #140 (
Cross).
Gentleman's Magazine, Feb. 1751, pp. 77-78, concerning
Gil Blas: To animadvert upon a piece which is almost universally condemned is unneccessary, and to defend this is impossible.
There is not one elegant expression or moral sentiment in
the dialogue; nor indeed one character in
the drama, from which ei
ther could be expected. It is however, to be wished that
the Town, which opposed this play with so much zeal, would exclude from
the theatre every o
ther in which
there is not more merit; for partiality and prejudice will be suspected in
the treatment of new plays, while such pieces as
the London Cuckolds, and
the City Wives Confederacy, are suffered to waste time and debauch
the morals of society....Upon
the whole
the Author appears to have intended ra
ther entertainment than instruction, and to have disgusted
the Pit by adapting his comedy to
the taste of
the Galleries....Perhaps
the ill success of this comedy is chiefly
the effect of
the author's having so widely mistaken
the character of
Gil Blas whom he has degraded from a man of sense, discernment, true humor, and great knowledge of mankind...to an impertinent silly, conceited coxcomb, a mere
Lying Valet, with all
the affectation of a Fop, and all
the insolence of a coward. [
Thomas Gray wrote to
Horace Walpole 3 March 1751, "
Gil Blas is
the Lying Valet in five acts.
The fine lady has half-a-dozen good lines dispersed in it."