30 December 1762

Event Information
Theatre: Covent Garden
Theatrical Season: 1762-1763
Volume: 4
Comments: By Command of their Majesties. [This seems to be the night referred to by The Volunteer Manager in Theatrical Review of 1 January 1763 who condemns Miss Poitier's scandalous costume and indelicate actions: "Would any person suppose she could have the confidence to appear with her bosom so scandalously bare, that to use the expression of a public writer, who took some moderate notice of the circumstance, the breast hung flabbing over a pair of stays cut remarkably low, like a couple of empty bladders in an oil-shop. One thing the author of that letter has omitted, which, if possible is still more gross; and that is, in the course of Miss Poitier's hornpipe, one of her shoes happening to slipt down at the heel, she lifted up her leg, and danced upon the other till she had drawn it up. This had she worn drawers, would have been the more excusable; but unhappily, there was little occasion for standing in the pit to see that she was not provided with so much as a fig-leaf. The Court turned instantly from the stage-The Pit was astonished! and scarcely anything, but a disapproving murmur, was heard, from the most unthinking spectator in the twelvepenny gallery." Miss Poitier subsequently denied any impropriety in action, and sought hearing in the Theatrical Review. In the Volunteer Manager" section of the number for 1 March 1763 the editiors reaffirmed their stand on her indecency and refused to join further in a personal altercation.

Performance List

Event Downloads

JSON XML CSV
  • Your web browser doesn't have a PDF plugin. Instead, click here to download the PDF file

  • Original Data

    Source: London Stage Information Bank

    *p??cg Love in a Village. As 29 Dec. *d??cg II: <i>The Sicilian Peasants</i>, as 25 Nov.; <i>Hornpipe</i>-Miss Poitier. *c??cg By Command of $their Majesties=. [This seems to be the night referred to by <i>The Volunteer Manager</i> in <i>Theatrical Review</i> of 1 January 1763 who condemns $Miss Poitier='s scandalous costume and indelicate actions: "Would any person suppose she could have the confidence to appear with her bosom so scandalously bare, that to use the expression of a public writer, who took some moderate notice of the circumstance, the breast hung flabbing over a pair of stays cut remarkably low, like a couple of empty bladders in an oil-shop. One thing the author of that letter has omitted, which, if possible is still more gross; and that is, in the course of Miss Poitier's hornpipe, one of her shoes happening to slipt down at the heel, she lifted up her leg, and danced upon the other till she had drawn it up. This had she worn drawers, would have been the more excusable; but unhappily, there was little occasion for standing in the pit to see that she was not provided with so much as a fig-leaf. The Court turned instantly from the stage-The Pit was astonished! and scarcely anything, but a disapproving murmur, was heard, from the most unthinking spectator in the twelvepenny gallery." Miss Poitier subsequently denied any impropriety in action, and sought hearing in the <i>Theatrical Review</i>. In the Volunteer Manager" section of the number for 1 March 1763 the editiors reaffirmed their stand on her indecency and refused to join further in a personal altercation.]
  • Cleaned Data

    *p1762 12 30 cg Love in a Village. ^As17621229^.*d1762 12 30 cg II: <i>The Sicilian Peasants</i>, ^as17621125^; <i>Hornpipe</i>-Miss Poitier.*c1762 12 30 cg By Command of $their Majesties=. [This seems to be the night referred to by <i>The Volunteer Manager</i> in <i>Theatrical Review</i> of 1 January 1763 who condemns $Miss Poitier='s scandalous costume and indelicate actions: "Would any person suppose she could have the confidence to appear with her bosom so scandalously bare, that to use the expression of a public writer, who took some moderate notice of the circumstance, the breast hung flabbing over a pair of stays cut remarkably low, like a couple of empty bladders in an oil-shop. One thing the author of that letter has omitted, which, if possible is still more gross; and that is, in the course of Miss Poitier's hornpipe, one of her shoes happening to slipt down at the heel, she lifted up her leg, and danced upon the other till she had drawn it up. This had she worn drawers, would have been the more excusable; but unhappily, there was little occasion for standing in the pit to see that she was not provided with so much as a fig-leaf. The Court turned instantly from the stage-The Pit was astonished! and scarcely anything, but a disapproving murmur, was heard, from the most unthinking spectator in the twelvepenny gallery." Miss Poitier subsequently denied any impropriety in action, and sought hearing in the <i>Theatrical Review</i>. In the Volunteer Manager" section of the number for 1 March 1763 the editiors reaffirmed their stand on her indecency and refused to join further in a personal altercation.]
  • Parsed Data

    Event: 31507 | 17621230 | cg | By Command of $their Majesties=. [This seems to be the night referred to by <i>The Volunteer Manager</i> in <i>Theatrical Review</i> of 1 January 1763 who condemns $Miss Poitier='s scandalous costume and indelicate actions: "Would any person suppose she could have the confidence to appear with her bosom so scandalously bare, that to use the expression of a public writer, who took some moderate notice of the circumstance, the breast hung flabbing over a pair of stays cut remarkably low, like a couple of empty bladders in an oil-shop. One thing the author of that letter has omitted, which, if possible is still more gross; and that is, in the course of Miss Poitier's hornpipe, one of her shoes happening to slipt down at the heel, she lifted up her leg, and danced upon the other till she had drawn it up. This had she worn drawers, would have been the more excusable; but unhappily, there was little occasion for standing in the pit to see that she was not provided with so much as a fig-leaf. The Court turned instantly from the stage-The Pit was astonished! and scarcely anything, but a disapproving murmur, was heard, from the most unthinking spectator in the twelvepenny gallery." Miss Poitier subsequently denied any impropriety in action, and sought hearing in the <i>Theatrical Review</i>. In the Volunteer Manager" section of the number for 1 March 1763 the editiors reaffirmed their stand on her indecency and refused to join further in a personal altercation.
    Performance: 64045 | 31507 | p | Love In A Village | As17621229.
    AsSeeDate: 64045 | cg | p | As | 17621229
    Cast:
    428977 | 64045 | Others | <i>Barrington, _Bennett.
    428978 | 64045 | Deborah Woodcock | Mrs Pitt replaces $Mrs Walker=.
    428979 | 64045 | Hawthorn | Beard
    428980 | 64045 | Justice Woodcock | Shuter
    428981 | 64045 | Young Meadows | Mattocks
    428982 | 64045 | Eustace | Dyer
    428983 | 64045 | Sir William Meadows | Collins
    428984 | 64045 | Hodge | Dunstall
    428985 | 64045 | Rosetta | Miss Brent
    428986 | 64045 | Lucinda | Miss Hallam
    428987 | 64045 | Margery | Miss Davies
    428988 | 64045 | <i>Dances Incident</i> to the Opera | Maranesi, Miss Twist.
    Performance: 64046 | 31507 | d | II: <i>The Sicilian Peasants</i>, as17621125; <i>Hornpipe</i>-Miss Poitier
    AsSeeDate: 64046 | cg | d | As | 17621125

Mainpiece

Comments:
As17621229.
Cast:

Dance

Comment: II: The Sicilian Peasants, as17621125; Hornpipe-Miss Poitier

Cite this page

Chicago:
MLA: