May 1691

Event Information
Theatre: Dorset Garden Theatre
Theatrical Season: 1690-1691
Volume: 1
Comments: The United Company. The date of the first performance is not known, but it very probably occurred not later than May 1691, as the play was advertised in the London Gazette, 4-8 June 1691. For discussions of it, see E. W. White, Early Performances of Purcell's Operas, Theatre Notebook, XIII (1958-59), 44-45, and R. E. Moore, Henry Purcell and the Restoration Theatre, Chapter III. Downes, Roscius Anglicanus, p. 42: King Arthur an Opera, wrote by Mr Dryden: it was Excellently Adorn'd with Scenes and Machines: The Musical Part set by Famous Mr Henry Purcel; and Dances made by Mr Jo. Priest: The Play and Musick pleas'd the Court and City, and being well perform'd, twas very Gainful to the Company. Roger North: I remember in Purcell's excellent opera of King Arthur, when Mrs Butler, in the person of Cupid, was to call up Genius, she had the liberty to turne her face to the scean, and ner back to the theater. She was in no concerne for her face, but sang a recitativo of calling towards the place where Genius was to rise, and performed it admirably, even beyond any thing I ever heard upon the English stage....And I could ascribe it to nothing so much as the liberty she had of concealing her face, which she could not endure should be so contorted as is necessary to sound well, before her gallants, or at least her envious sex. There was so much of admirable musick in that opera, that it's no wonder it's lost; for the English have no care of what's good, and therefore deserve it not (Roger North on Music, ed. John Wilson [London, 1959], p. 217-18)

Performance List

Event Downloads

JSON XML CSV
  • Your web browser doesn't have a PDF plugin. Instead, click here to download the PDF file

  • Original Data

    Source: London Stage Information Bank

    *p0?dg King Arthur; or, The British Worthy. [Edition of 1691:% King Arthur-Betterton; Oswald, King of Kent-Williams; Conon-Hodgson; Merlin-Kynaston; Osmond-Sandford; Aurelius-Alexander [$Verbruggen=]; Albanact-Bowen; Guillamar-Harris; Emmeline-Mrs Bracegirdle; Matilda-Mrs Richardson; Philidel-Mrs Butler; Grimbald-Bowman; Prologue to the Opera-Mr Betterton; The Epilogue-Mrs Bracegirdle. *c0?dg The <i>United Company</i>. The date of the first performance is not known, but it very probably occurred not later than May 1691, as the play was advertised in the <i>London Gazette</i>, 4-8 June 1691. For discussions of it, see $E. W. White=, <i>Early Performances of Purcell's Operas</i>, <i>Theatre Notebook</i>, XIII (1958-59), 44-45, and $R. E. Moore=, <i>Henry Purcell and the Restoration Theatre</i>, Chapter III. $Downes=, <i>Roscius Anglicanus</i>, p. 42: <i>King Arthur</i> an Opera, wrote by $Mr Dryden=: it was Excellently Adorn'd with Scenes and Machines: The Musical Part set by Famous $Mr Henry Purcel=; and Dances made by $Mr Jo. Priest=: The Play and Musick pleas'd the Court and City, and being well perform'd, twas very Gainful to the Company. $Roger North=: I remember in Purcell's excellent opera of <i>King Arthur</i>, when $Mrs Butler=, in the person of <i>Cupid</i>r, was to call up <i>Genius</i>r, she had the liberty to turne her face to the scean, and ner back to the theater. She was in no concerne for her face, but sang a recitativo of calling towards the place where Genius was to rise, and performed it admirably, even beyond any thing I ever heard upon the <i>English stage</i>....And I could ascribe it to nothing so much as the liberty she had of concealing her face, which she could not endure should be so contorted as is necessary to sound well, before her gallants, or at least her envious sex. There was so much of admirable musick in that opera, that it's no wonder it's lost; for the English have no care of what's good, and therefore deserve it not (<i>Roger North on Music</i>, ed. $John Wilson= [London, 1959], p. 217-18).
  • Cleaned Data

    *p1691 05 00 dg King Arthur; or, The British Worthy. Edition of 1691: King Arthur-Betterton; Oswald, King of Kent-Williams; Conon-Hodgson; Merlin-Kynaston; Osmond-Sandford; Aurelius-Alexander [$Verbruggen=]; Albanact-Bowen; Guillamar-Harris; Emmeline-Mrs Bracegirdle; Matilda-Mrs Richardson; Philidel-Mrs Butler; Grimbald-Bowman; Prologue to the Opera-Mr Betterton; The Epilogue-Mrs Bracegirdle.*c1691 05 00 dg The <i>United Company</i>. The date of the first performance is not known, but it very probably occurred not later than May 1691, as the play was advertised in the <i>London Gazette</i>, 4-8 June 1691. For discussions of it, see $E. W. White=, <i>Early Performances of Purcell's Operas</i>, <i>Theatre Notebook</i>, XIII (1958-59), 44-45, and $R. E. Moore=, <i>Henry Purcell and the Restoration Theatre</i>, Chapter III. $Downes=, <i>Roscius Anglicanus</i>, p. 42: <i>King Arthur</i> an Opera, wrote by $Mr Dryden=: it was Excellently Adorn'd with Scenes and Machines: The Musical Part set by Famous $Mr Henry Purcel=; and Dances made by $Mr Jo. Priest=: The Play and Musick pleas'd the Court and City, and being well perform'd, twas very Gainful to the Company. $Roger North=: I remember in Purcell's excellent opera of <i>King Arthur</i>, when $Mrs Butler=, in the person of <i>Cupid</i>r, was to call up <i>Genius</i>r, she had the liberty to turne her face to the scean, and ner back to the theater. She was in no concerne for her face, but sang a recitativo of calling towards the place where Genius was to rise, and performed it admirably, even beyond any thing I ever heard upon the <i>English stage</i>....And I could ascribe it to nothing so much as the liberty she had of concealing her face, which she could not endure should be so contorted as is necessary to sound well, before her gallants, or at least her envious sex. There was so much of admirable musick in that opera, that it's no wonder it's lost; for the English have no care of what's good, and therefore deserve it not (<i>Roger North on Music</i>, ed. $John Wilson= [London, 1959], p. 217-18).
  • Parsed Data

    Event: 1794 | 16910500 | dg | The <i>United Company</i>. The date of the first performance is not known, but it very probably occurred not later than May 1691, as the play was advertised in the <i>London Gazette</i>, 4-8 June 1691. For discussions of it, see $E. W. White=, <i>Early Performances of Purcell's Operas</i>, <i>Theatre Notebook</i>, XIII (1958-59), 44-45, and $R. E. Moore=, <i>Henry Purcell and the Restoration Theatre</i>, Chapter III. $Downes=, <i>Roscius Anglicanus</i>, p. 42: <i>King Arthur</i> an Opera, wrote by $Mr Dryden=: it was Excellently Adorn'd with Scenes and Machines: The Musical Part set by Famous $Mr Henry Purcel=; and Dances made by $Mr Jo. Priest=: The Play and Musick pleas'd the Court and City, and being well perform'd, twas very Gainful to the Company. $Roger North=: I remember in Purcell's excellent opera of <i>King Arthur</i>, when $Mrs Butler=, in the person of <i>Cupid</i>, was to call up <i>Genius</i>, she had the liberty to turne her face to the scean, and ner back to the theater. She was in no concerne for her face, but sang a recitativo of calling towards the place where Genius was to rise, and performed it admirably, even beyond any thing I ever heard upon the <i>English stage</i>....And I could ascribe it to nothing so much as the liberty she had of concealing her face, which she could not endure should be so contorted as is necessary to sound well, before her gallants, or at least her envious sex. There was so much of admirable musick in that opera, that it's no wonder it's lost; for the English have no care of what's good, and therefore deserve it not (<i>Roger North on Music</i>, ed. $John Wilson= [London, 1959], p. 217-18)
    Performance: 1799 | 1794 | p | King Arthur; Or, The British Worthy | Edition of 1691: King Arthur-Betterton; Oswald, King of Kent-Williams; Conon-Hodgson; Merlin-Kynaston; Osmond-Sandford; Aurelius-Alexander [$Verbruggen=]; Albanact-Bowen; Guillamar-Harris; Emmeline-Mrs Bracegirdle; Matilda-Mrs Richardson; Philidel-Mrs Butler; Grimbald-Bowman; Prologue to the Opera-Mr Betterton; The Epilogue-Mrs Bracegirdle.
    Cast:
    3060 | 1799 | King Arthur | Betterton
    3061 | 1799 | King of Kent | Williams
    3062 | 1799 | Conon | Hodgson
    3063 | 1799 | Merlin | Kynaston
    3064 | 1799 | Osmond | Sandford
    3065 | 1799 | Aurelius | Alexander
    3066 | 1799 | Albanact | Bowen
    3067 | 1799 | Guillamar | Harris
    3068 | 1799 | Emmeline | Mrs Bracegirdle
    3069 | 1799 | Matilda | Mrs Richardson
    3070 | 1799 | Philidel | Mrs Butler
    3071 | 1799 | Grimbald | Bowman
    3072 | 1799 | Prologue to the Opera | Mr Betterton
    3073 | 1799 | The Epilogue | Mrs Bracegirdle.

Mainpiece

Comments:
Edition of 1691: King Arthur-Betterton; Oswald, King of Kent-Williams; Conon-Hodgson; Merlin-Kynaston; Osmond-Sandford; Aurelius-Alexander [Verbruggen]; Albanact-Bowen; Guillamar-Harris; Emmeline-Mrs Bracegirdle; Matilda-Mrs Richardson; Philidel-Mrs Butler; Grimbald-Bowman; Prologue to the Opera-Mr Betterton; The Epilogue-Mrs Bracegirdle.
Cast:

Cite this page

Chicago:
MLA: